Reasoning
Estimates, underwriting reviews, financial checks, and the reasons behind a decision.
Company records for AI training
Azoth determines whether yours may qualify.
Buyers seek records that capture decisions, work, and outcomes. We define the asset, approach relevant buyers, and negotiate price, permitted uses, and delivery terms.
Published buyer programs advertise $100K–$2M+ for approved packages. These are third-party program ranges, not Azoth results.1
Have an offer? Request a market checkProposed license
Defined records and uses.
You approve the scope and the terms.
For approved company data packages. Market context, not Azoth results or a valuation.
The success fee applies only when a deal is completed. We agree the terms before work begins.
You approve what may be shared and whether to accept a deal.
What buyers evaluate
Buyers look for the problem, the work performed, the decisions made, and the result. That history may be stored in email, documents, call recordings, or business software.2
Estimates, underwriting reviews, financial checks, and the reasons behind a decision.
Service tickets, technician notes, project changes, and the steps taken to complete the work.
Follow-up work, reviews, revisions, and results tied to the original decision.
Our initial review starts with at least two years of retained operating history. Record quality and licensing rights matter more than industry labels.
Illustrative range
Answer a few questions to see a broad planning range and the assumptions behind it. No email address or file upload is required.
A broad range with stated assumptions
Factors that could raise or lower it
Your answers stay in this browser
The tool uses published buyer-program pricing as market context. It has not reviewed your records or any buyer bids. See how the range works.
Illustrative gross licensing ranges, before fees, costs, and taxes. Actual results can be $0 or outside the range. No buyer has reviewed your records.
Why run a buyer process
Azoth identifies relevant buyers, compares proposals, and negotiates the commercial terms.
We compare net proceeds, permitted uses, and the rights you retain—not only the largest headline price.
Already have an offer? The Azoth Market Test™ compares its price, permitted uses, and other terms with alternatives available in the market.
Request an offer reviewHow an engagement works
Azoth runs the process.
You approve the scope and the deal.
Find useful work history and flag what needs to stay private.
Build an initial range and explain the assumptions behind it.
Test demand with qualified buyers and seek competing offers.
Negotiate the money, approved uses, protections, and future rights.
Coordinate closing and delivery if you choose to accept the deal.
The Azoth Market Test™ uses buyer feedback to test the initial range. A buyer may decline to bid.
You approve the scope before any records are shared.
Division of work
We need business context, access to the appropriate people, and your decisions at each approval point. You do not need to organize every file or contact buyers.
Explain the business, identify the right people, and approve or reject the proposed scope and deal.
Assess the records, contact buyers, compare proposals, and negotiate commercial terms.
Complete the agreed technical and legal work. Responsibilities are set before access begins.
Scope and data controls
The proposed scope identifies the records, the buyer, permitted uses, handling requirements, and any onward sharing. Sensitive material requires separate review.
Rights and privacy are checked from the start. Legal and technical specialists are involved where needed; no process eliminates every risk.
Rights after the first license
The first agreement can address new records, updates, renewals, and licenses to other buyers. Whether another transaction is possible depends on the rights retained and future demand.
Transaction experience
Azoth’s founder has more than seven years of investment-banking experience across approximately $7 billion in transactions, along with experience in operations, risk, and compliance.
This background informs how Azoth handles pricing, negotiation, diligence, and sensitive records.
Founder’s prior career experience
Investment banking experience
Transaction experience
Prior career experience—not Azoth data-licensing results, assets under management, or a promise of future results.
Common questions
These terms should be clear before an engagement begins or records are shared.
A defined set of records, with agreed rules for who can use them and how. That may include selected projects, support histories, documents, or records of business decisions. It is not an offer to buy your company.
We identify the proposed material, set boundaries, and explain the rights before you approve a deal.
Current pilot engagements have $0 upfront. No completed deal means no success fee. We agree the rate and payment terms with you before starting an engagement.
Any outside legal or technical work—and who pays for it—must also be agreed in advance. Future licenses and renewals have separately agreed economics.
Some buyers may separately pay us for sourcing qualified opportunities, preparing sellers, and coordinating the process. That does not automatically replace your agreed fee.
Our work for you is to evaluate the opportunity, test demand, and negotiate your deal. We do not advise the buyer on how to negotiate against you. We address relevant compensation arrangements in the engagement and answer your questions before you commit.
Yes. Our review starts with established businesses that retain at least two years of operating records. Individual buyers may apply different criteria.
We assess the amount and substance of the records and whether the company can license them. Company size alone is insufficient.
We identify restrictions before sharing records. Some material may need to be excluded; other material may need anonymization, redaction, or another safeguard. The buyer’s proposed uses also matter.
Removing names is not the same as removing every risk. Rights, confidentiality, and the proposed data-handling process need their own review. If an acceptable scope cannot be agreed, the transaction should not proceed.
It is an illustrative planning tool—not an appraisal or a buyer quote. The ranges are broad scenarios informed by public buyer-program pricing. The way answers select a scenario is a working assumption, not a model trained on Azoth transactions.
It explains the reasons, open questions, and factors that could change the picture. Actual proceeds can be $0 or outside the displayed range. Prices shown are before fees, costs, and taxes.
Yes. Azoth earns its fee when the additional buyer search, comparison, or negotiation improves the seller’s position.
We compare net proceeds, usage rights, and obligations across proposals. Additional bidders and a higher price are not guaranteed.
Possibly. New records, renewals, refreshes, or another buyer can support a later license if the first agreement preserves those rights and demand exists. Recurring revenue is not guaranteed.
You decide whether to accept each transaction. Requesting a review does not commit the company to a license.
Initial review
Describe the business and its retained work history. We will identify the questions that need to be resolved before approaching buyers.
Current pilots require $0 upfront.
The initial review requires no raw records and creates no obligation to transact.
Provide a short description. Do not attach files or grant system access.